Quality expansion
Experiment context beside the regulated LIMS record
ELN is for narrative, design, and exploratory work. Aureon positions it as a companion to LIMS — not a replacement for sample, result, and CoA control.
The problem
Why this matters on the bench
Teams often ask one tool to be both an ELN and a LIMS. That usually weakens either compliance or scientific flexibility.
Capabilities
How it works
ELN, step by step
Capture the experiment
Notes, attachments, and design live in the notebook context.
Link to LIMS objects
When work becomes a regulated test, it points at samples and methods.
Keep roles clear
Release and CoA still come from LIMS-controlled results.
Regulatory relevance
Compliance, precisely stated
ELN content may be GxP-relevant depending on use. Scope that boundary in validation. See also our LIMS vs ELN article.
Aureon LIMS is designed to support 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO/IEC 17025 workflows. It is not FDA-approved or “Part 11 certified.” Customers remain responsible for system validation, SOP alignment, and regulatory interpretation in their own quality system.
Related modules
Questions
What evaluators ask
If you release product or issue CoAs, start with LIMS. Add ELN when experiment narrative is the gap.
See eln against your SOPs
Book a demo or talk to sales about scope and validation support.